Training course · Agentic Coding · Security & DevSecOps

Agentic Coding for Security and DevSecOps Teams

Use autonomous coding agents effectively: specs instead of prompts, task decomposition, test-driven loops, multi-agent setups and governance.

Duration
2 days (14 hrs)
Format
Online or on-site
Language
German or English
Participants
open dates or exclusive for your team
Certificate
Certificate of attendance

Overview

“Agentic Coding for Security and DevSecOps Teams” is designed for roles such as Application security engineers and security champions in development teams, DevSecOps and platform engineers responsible for CI/CD pipelines and Penetration testers and red team members and shows step by step how to use Agentic Coding productively, safely and transparently in Security & DevSecOps – from the fundamentals to advanced workflows.

Agentic coding means working with AI agents that carry out development tasks largely on their own: they read code, plan changes, run commands and tests, and correct themselves based on the results. Tools such as Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, the GitHub Copilot coding agent and Cursor’s agent mode have made this way of working practical for everyday use. This vendor-neutral course teaches the underlying methodology so that you achieve reliable results whatever the tool, and redefine the developer’s role within your engineering team.

The core shift is from ad hoc prompts to robust specifications. You will learn to decompose and describe tasks so that agents solve them reliably, to set up test-driven loops in which tests act as objective acceptance criteria, and to run several agents in parallel or with a division of labour. We also cover review strategies for agent-generated code and team governance: permissions, security boundaries, accountability, cost control and the gradual introduction of agentic workflows into your existing development processes.

AI coding assistants and agents affect application security from two directions. They speed up threat modelling, code review and detection engineering, yet they also produce new code faster than traditional security gates can absorb. Security and DevSecOps teams therefore use AI to triage SAST findings, propose fixes for vulnerabilities, harden CI/CD pipelines and scan infrastructure as code for misconfigurations. What matters is a controlled setup: agents running with least privilege, no secrets in the prompt context, every change traceable through a pull request and human sign-off on security-critical decisions. In this course you learn to use AI as a force multiplier for your security programme while keeping the new risks of generated code, prompt injection and insecure tool integrations firmly under control.

The course is delivered live – either online in a virtual classroom or on-site in our training rooms in Munich, Salzburg, Berlin, Augsburg, Hanover, Bremen, Stuttgart and Kaiserslautern. We can also run it exclusively for your team.

Who is this course for?

  • Application security engineers and security champions in development teams
  • DevSecOps and platform engineers responsible for CI/CD pipelines
  • Penetration testers and red team members
  • SOC analysts and detection engineers
  • Developers accountable for secure software supply chains

Typical challenges we address

  • A flood of SAST, DAST and SCA findings with a high share of false positives
  • Security review becomes a bottleneck as AI-assisted teams ship far more code
  • Misconfigurations in Terraform, Kubernetes manifests and cloud policies go unnoticed
  • New attack surfaces from LLM integrations, prompt injection and over-privileged agents

What you will be able to do

  • You understand how coding agents work and choose the right tool and level of autonomy.
  • You write specifications and project context that agents can work with reliably.
  • You break initiatives into verifiable sub-tasks and steer agents through test-driven loops.
  • You use multi-agent setups and parallel work in a controlled way.
  • Use AI agents for triage, review and fix generation without giving up control over security-critical changes.
  • Integrate AI-assisted checks into CI/CD pipelines alongside your existing SAST, SCA and IaC scanners.
  • Assess and mitigate the specific risks of AI-generated code, prompt injection and agent tool access.

Course outline

Day 1

Module 1 Foundations of agentic development
  • How coding agents work: tool calls, context windows and feedback loops
  • Comparing tools: terminal agents, IDE agents and cloud agents
  • Recognising suitable tasks and choosing levels of autonomy deliberately
  • The new role in the team: from implementation to steering and acceptance
Module 2 Specifications instead of prompts
  • Describing tasks with goal, context, constraints and acceptance criteria
  • Keeping project context in files such as CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or rules
  • Plan-first approach: let the agent draft a solution and review it before implementation
  • Versioning specifications and maintaining them as part of the repository
Module 3 Task decomposition and test-driven agent loops
  • Breaking large initiatives into independent, verifiable sub-tasks
  • Having tests written first and using them as an objective stopping criterion
  • Using linters, type checks and builds as automatic feedback
  • Recognising stuck loops and restarting with a new strategy
Module 4 Multi-agent setups and parallel work
  • Defining specialised subagents for research, implementation, testing and review
  • Organising parallel work with branches, worktrees and isolated environments
  • Orchestration: merging results and resolving conflicts
  • Sharing tools and data sources through MCP

Day 2

Module 5 Review, security and team governance
  • Review strategies for large, agent-generated changes
  • Defining permissions, sandboxing and protection against prompt injection
  • Embedding agents in CI pipelines and pull request processes
  • Planning team guidelines, accountability, costs and a phased rollout
Module 6 Practice lab: Security & DevSecOps
  • Faster threat modelling
  • SAST finding triage
  • Secure code review
  • Hardening IaC and containers
  • Detection engineering
  • Securing the supply chain
Module 7 Data protection, quality & transfer to daily work
  • Source code, vulnerability data and logs are highly sensitive: you learn which data may be shared with AI services, how to keep secrets out of the context and how AI use aligns with NIS2, the Cyber Resilience Act, the GDPR and the EU AI Act.
  • Ground rules for safe AI use in your team
  • Checking results: facts, sources, tests and the four-eyes principle
  • Personal action plan for the next 30 days
  • Open questions, outlook and resources for further learning

Practical scenarios from your field

Faster threat modelling

Derive STRIDE-based threat analyses from architecture descriptions and data flow diagrams, identify trust boundaries and turn countermeasures into testable requirements ready for the backlog. The model is updated rather than rebuilt when the architecture changes.

SAST finding triage

Match static analysis results against real code context, assess reachability and exploitability, dismiss false positives with a documented rationale and prepare minimal fixes for genuine vulnerabilities as pull requests.

Secure code review

Have pull requests checked specifically for injection flaws, broken authorisation, insecure deserialisation and cryptographic mistakes, with references to OWASP categories and a clear explanation for every finding.

Hardening IaC and containers

Analyse Terraform modules, Helm charts and Dockerfiles for over-privileged roles, exposed ports, missing encryption and unsafe base images, then generate hardened versions backed by policy-as-code rules.

Detection engineering

Draft Sigma rules, YARA signatures and SIEM queries from threat descriptions, validate them against test data and enrich documentation with the relevant MITRE ATT&CK techniques.

Securing the supply chain

Evaluate SBOMs, prioritise vulnerable dependencies, analyse upgrade paths including breaking changes and add pipeline steps for signing, provenance attestation and dependency pinning. Each update pull request explains the risk.

Possible hands-on projects

Finding triage bot

A script that ingests SARIF output from the pipeline, deduplicates findings, enriches them with code context and opens prioritised tickets with a suggested fix.

Secret scanning hook

A pre-commit hook with custom patterns for internal token formats, allowlist management and clear guidance on how to rotate a leaked secret.

Threat model generator

A small web app that turns a system description into a structured threat model with data flows, risks and mitigations, exportable as a document.

Prerequisites

You have several years of development experience, are confident with Git, testing and CI, and ideally have already used AI coding tools. You have hands-on experience in software development or operations and a working knowledge of application security, such as the OWASP Top 10 and CI/CD pipelines.

Technical requirements

Your own laptop with Git, a terminal and your development environment, plus access to at least one coding agent such as Claude Code, Codex, Copilot or Cursor.

Data protection & compliance

Source code, vulnerability data and logs are highly sensitive: you learn which data may be shared with AI services, how to keep secrets out of the context and how AI use aligns with NIS2, the Cyber Resilience Act, the GDPR and the EU AI Act.

Suggested dates

All dates are suggestions – your preferred date is always possible.

  • Mon, 23 November 2026 – Tue, 24 November 2026 Online Request
  • Wed, 2 December 2026 – Thu, 3 December 2026 Augsburg Request
  • Tue, 15 December 2026 – Wed, 16 December 2026 Online Request
  • Thu, 7 January 2027 – Fri, 8 January 2027 Online Request
  • Thu, 21 January 2027 – Fri, 22 January 2027 Kaiserslautern Request
  • Thu, 4 February 2027 – Fri, 5 February 2027 Online Request

Frequently asked questions

How does agentic coding differ from vibe coding?

Vibe coding relies on fast, intuitive iteration in natural language and is particularly suited to prototypes. Agentic coding is an engineering discipline for professional codebases: precise specifications, tests as acceptance criteria, clear permissions and structured reviews ensure that agents deliver reliable, maintainable results even in complex, long-lived projects.

Is the course tied to a specific tool?

No. The course teaches methods that work with Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, the GitHub Copilot coding agent, Cursor and comparable tools. The exercises highlight differences and common ground, for example in context files, permissions and subagents. You can work with whichever tool your organisation already uses or plans to adopt.

How do we stay in control of quality and security with autonomous agents?

Control comes from several layers: tightly scoped permissions and sandboxing, tests and static analysis as automatic checks, mandatory human review before merging, and clear team rules on accountability. During the course you develop a governance concept that fits your processes, security requirements and regulatory obligations.

Is AI-generated code a security risk?

AI assistants sometimes reproduce insecure patterns, outdated libraries or even non-existent package names. The risk is manageable when generated code passes the same gates as hand-written code: peer review, SAST, dependency scanning and tests. In the course you set up exactly these guardrails while using AI yourself to find and fix vulnerabilities faster.

Should an AI agent be allowed to apply security fixes on its own?

We recommend a tiered model: the agent analyses, proposes fixes and opens pull requests, while humans approve the merge. For low-risk routine work such as dependency updates with passing tests, more automation can make sense. You learn to design permissions, sandboxing and audit trails so every decision remains traceable.

How much does “Agentic Coding for Security and DevSecOps Teams” cost?

The course costs a flat €949 plus VAT per participant – whether online or on-site. This includes 2 training day(s) with a live trainer, course materials, a lab environment and a certificate of attendance.

Can I suggest my own date?

Yes. Our suggested dates are just a guide. In the request form you can always describe your preferred date or period in free text – we check availability and confirm within one working day.

Is the course online or on-site?

Both are possible: live online in a virtual classroom or on-site in Munich, Salzburg, Berlin, Augsburg, Hanover, Bremen, Stuttgart or Kaiserslautern. We can also run the course exclusively for your team.

More courses for Security and DevSecOps Teams

More Agentic Coding courses

All 32 Agentic Coding courses

Agentic Coding · MunichAgentic Coding · SalzburgAgentic Coding · BerlinAgentic Coding · AugsburgAgentic Coding · HanoverAgentic Coding · BremenAgentic Coding · StuttgartAgentic Coding · KaiserslauternAgentic Coding · Online